<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Power Users Will Stick to Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/</link>
	<description>analyzing lifestyles</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Praveen</title>
		<link>http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/#comment-236088</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifespy.com/?p=3506#comment-236088</guid>
		<description>Well said.
Firefox does (almost)everything for me.
I too dont need another browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.<br />
Firefox does (almost)everything for me.<br />
I too dont need another browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midnightzak</title>
		<link>http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/#comment-234088</link>
		<dc:creator>Midnightzak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifespy.com/?p=3506#comment-234088</guid>
		<description>Though this comment is worded well, it still is way off base.  Chrome is a BETA and should be treated as such.  This browser is super quick and will definitely be a contender in the browser war.  But you need to give it time to come out of its BETA stage and you need to give addin/plugin authors time to create extensions that work with this browser.

Short version = don't jump the gun, its a Beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though this comment is worded well, it still is way off base.  Chrome is a BETA and should be treated as such.  This browser is super quick and will definitely be a contender in the browser war.  But you need to give it time to come out of its BETA stage and you need to give addin/plugin authors time to create extensions that work with this browser.</p>
<p>Short version = don&#8217;t jump the gun, its a Beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigi</title>
		<link>http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/#comment-234058</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifespy.com/?p=3506#comment-234058</guid>
		<description>I think that over some time, after the Chrome community matures a bit, we might have some nice, powerful addons and things will change. This post reflects my exact opinion about the whole thing. I really like the way you get so much more real estate when you're browsing pages with Chrome but, as a developer, it doesn't have all I need yet. I will leave it installed but FFox will still be my main browser for working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that over some time, after the Chrome community matures a bit, we might have some nice, powerful addons and things will change. This post reflects my exact opinion about the whole thing. I really like the way you get so much more real estate when you&#8217;re browsing pages with Chrome but, as a developer, it doesn&#8217;t have all I need yet. I will leave it installed but FFox will still be my main browser for working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no0nee</title>
		<link>http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/#comment-233878</link>
		<dc:creator>no0nee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifespy.com/?p=3506#comment-233878</guid>
		<description>You realize that Chrome is still in a very early stage, all your favorite extensions and addons did not exist within the beta versions of Firefox, they were evolved out of necessity.  There are already third party developers creating new customization options for chrome (as it is open source and Google intended this) and I am sure in the future we will see the same amount of customization that Firefox offers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You realize that Chrome is still in a very early stage, all your favorite extensions and addons did not exist within the beta versions of Firefox, they were evolved out of necessity.  There are already third party developers creating new customization options for chrome (as it is open source and Google intended this) and I am sure in the future we will see the same amount of customization that Firefox offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techie</title>
		<link>http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/#comment-232534</link>
		<dc:creator>Techie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifespy.com/?p=3506#comment-232534</guid>
		<description>Firefox extensions give a whole new meaning to browsing experience. Even if people are not Power users, once they get accustomed to using it ,they at some point if time would ask : Can this task be done quicker without leaving my browser, can I have a new look for the page, can the ads on a page be removed etc and Firefox answers all these type of quesions with a strong "Yes". Chrome simplicity is good but I guess going in future it would be like people liking a new version of notepad but as they start using it they want to advance. 
Just to mention, Mozilla Ubiquity project totally adds a new dimension in the way one does a task on internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox extensions give a whole new meaning to browsing experience. Even if people are not Power users, once they get accustomed to using it ,they at some point if time would ask : Can this task be done quicker without leaving my browser, can I have a new look for the page, can the ads on a page be removed etc and Firefox answers all these type of quesions with a strong &#8220;Yes&#8221;. Chrome simplicity is good but I guess going in future it would be like people liking a new version of notepad but as they start using it they want to advance.<br />
Just to mention, Mozilla Ubiquity project totally adds a new dimension in the way one does a task on internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K-IntheHouse</title>
		<link>http://www.lifespy.com/2008/power-users-will-stick-to-firefox/#comment-231748</link>
		<dc:creator>K-IntheHouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifespy.com/?p=3506#comment-231748</guid>
		<description>Very well said and I have to strongly agree with you. I tried to use Chrome but I just keep gravitating back to my highly customized Firefox. As the Chrome community starts churning out the most Firefox extension clones for Chrome, we will see more of the Firefox power users switching. This is definitely evident with the release of Greasemonkey equivalent for Chrome. 

Stumbled!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said and I have to strongly agree with you. I tried to use Chrome but I just keep gravitating back to my highly customized Firefox. As the Chrome community starts churning out the most Firefox extension clones for Chrome, we will see more of the Firefox power users switching. This is definitely evident with the release of Greasemonkey equivalent for Chrome. </p>
<p>Stumbled!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
